» Browse Photos | Browse Articles | Legal Information | Links | Contact Us | Subscriber Login
      

Webphotos Free Articles

Articles » Media Room » Education Media Releases » The Great Trade-off in Vocational Education

The Great Trade-off in Vocational Education

 

DOES AN ELECTRICIAN KNOW WHAT AN ELECTRON IS ANY MORE?

Or

CHEAP EDUCATION, TOP SHELF BUREACRACY!

 

Vocational Education has built a wonderful bureaucracy in recent decades. We are now auditing our colleges and producing reports more than ever. We’re also producing more diploma and certificate graduates for the education investment.

There’s been a trade off though –shorter courses, poorer facilities and dissatisfied employers.

 

What needs to be done?

  • Government should endorse education because it is good, not because it is prepared to run the gambit of bureaucrats.
  • Reduce emphasis on accreditation, increase emphasis on quality education
  • Audit less, teach more. Cap bureaucratic spending (incl. auditing) at 10% of what is spent on course delivery.
  • Reduce bureaucracy.
  • Teachers AND bureaucrats/auditors should be first qualified and experienced in the discipline they deal with –and only once that is achieved, given the teaching skills to educate in that discipline.
  • Embrace diverse, new and innovative approaches to education such as experiential learning, problem based learning, online & distance education etc.

 

 

Does Accreditation Impair Innovation in Education?

 

Many post secondary institutions are finding the bureaucracy involved in dealing with accreditation has become excessive, to the point that it may be decreasing rather than improving the quality of education.

 

Comments were invited from some industry leaders. See what they have said below.

 

If you would like to add a comment send it to john@iarcedu.com

 

 

Comment from John Mason  Principal ACS Distance Education  www.acs.edu.au

 

After 20 years of having courses both accredited and not accredited; we can see that while accreditation controls how bad a college can get; it also controls how good it can get.

By definition, accreditation systems are naturally trying to fit everyone into the same box.

The problem is that when you have an ethical and innovative college that is trying to do a better and more efficient job; the system can become very limiting. It takes money that might otherwise be spent on teaching; and redirects that money into bureaucracy. It stops rapid changes in courses (in a rapidly changing world), and imposes planning and management processes that make it impossible to keep up with the real needs of the world.

How much then is accreditation a measure of what is good? Maybe it is no more than just a measure of what is not bad

I am forever optimistic; but cannot see how we can approach improved learning while we limit the scope of innovation.

Why do we need accreditation systems anyway?  Is it because our teachers are so incompetent and unethical that they need bureaucrats to control them.  Who then ensures the bureaucrats are competent and ethical though?

 

 Select a topic: Plants | Landscaping | Hospitality | More... | Search:
The information given is for general information and should not be regarded as advice in any matter.
ACS Distance Education disclaims all and any liability in relation to any act or omission which is done in reliance to the information provided in this web site.
While every effort is made to ensure that we display correct information on our website, errors can occur.
ACS Distance Education disclaims liability or responsibility for orders or complaints arising from such errors, including (but not limited to): pricing, fees and course requirements.
ACS Distance Education reserves the right to decline orders arising from such errors.
ACN: 006 249 476, ABN: 69 424 798 419